# What Is the Relevance of Game Theory in Analyzing Oligopolistic Market?

//

Martha Robinson

Game theory is a field of study that deals with the mathematical modeling of decision-making among various agents in situations where the outcome of each agent’s decision depends on the decisions of others. It has numerous applications in economics, political science, and other social sciences where strategic interactions between multiple actors are common. One such application is in analyzing oligopolistic markets.

An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of firms that dominate the market. These firms often engage in strategic behavior such as price collusion or predatory pricing to gain an advantage over their competitors. Game theory can be used to model the behavior of these firms and predict their actions in response to changes in market conditions.

The Prisoner’s Dilemma

One classic example of game theory applied to oligopoly is the prisoner’s dilemma. In this scenario, two suspects are arrested for a crime but are held separately and cannot communicate with each other. They are given two options: cooperate with each other by remaining silent, or betray each other by confessing to the crime.

If both suspects remain silent, they will both receive a light sentence for a lesser offense. However, if one betrays the other while the other remains silent, the betrayer receives no sentence while the silent one receives a heavy sentence. If both betray each other, they both receive a moderate sentence.

This game can be modeled using game theory, with each player having two strategies: cooperate or defect (betray). The payoff matrix for this game shows that both players have an incentive to defect regardless of what their opponent does, resulting in a suboptimal outcome for both parties.

The Cournot Model

Another popular game-theoretic model used to analyze oligopoly is the Cournot model. This model assumes that firms compete by choosing how much output to produce rather than setting prices directly.

In this model, there are two firms competing against each other and they simultaneously choose their production levels. The total market demand is given, and the firms must decide how much of that demand they want to capture by producing a certain quantity of output.

The Cournot model can be solved using calculus to find the Nash equilibrium, which is the point where neither firm can improve its position by changing its strategy unilaterally. This equilibrium provides insight into the likely outcomes of oligopolistic markets and helps predict how firms will react to changes in market conditions.

The Bertrand Model

The Bertrand model is another game-theoretic model used to analyze oligopoly. In this model, firms compete by setting prices rather than quantities. It assumes that consumers will always choose the lowest-priced product available in the market.

In this model, there are two firms competing against each other and they simultaneously choose their prices. The firm with the lowest price captures all of the market demand while the other firm captures none.

The Bertrand model can also be solved using calculus to find the Nash equilibrium. This equilibrium provides insight into how firms will likely react to changes in market conditions such as changes in demand or costs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, game theory is a powerful tool for analyzing oligopolistic markets and predicting how firms will react to changes in market conditions. By modeling strategic interactions between multiple actors, game theory provides insights into optimal outcomes for all parties involved and helps prevent suboptimal outcomes caused by strategic behavior such as price collusion or predatory pricing.

By understanding these models and applying them appropriately, economists can help policymakers design regulations that promote competition while protecting consumers from anti-competitive behavior by firms in oligopolistic markets.