What Is the Example of Game Theory Strategy?

//

Vincent White

Game theory is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of strategic decision-making among multiple players. It is widely used in various fields, including economics, political science, psychology, and biology. In game theory, players use different strategies to maximize their payoff or minimize their loss.

One example of a game theory strategy is the Prisoner’s Dilemma. In this game, two suspects are arrested for committing a crime together.

The police have insufficient evidence to convict them of the crime but can charge them with a lesser offense. The suspects are held in separate cells and cannot communicate with each other.

The police offer each suspect a deal: if one suspect confesses and implicates the other suspect, they will receive a reduced sentence while the other suspect will receive a harsher one. If both suspects confess, they will receive moderate sentences. If both remain silent, they will receive minimal sentences.

In this scenario, each player has two strategies: confess or remain silent. If both players choose to remain silent, they will receive minimal sentences (the best outcome).

However, if one player confesses while the other remains silent, the confessor receives a reduced sentence (the second-best outcome) while the silent player receives the harshest sentence (the worst outcome). If both players confess, they will receive moderate sentences (the third-best outcome).

This game demonstrates how individual incentives can lead to suboptimal outcomes for both parties when played rationally. The optimal solution for both parties is to cooperate and remain silent; however, this solution is difficult to achieve because each party has an incentive to defect and implicate the other party.

Another example of game theory strategy is the Nash equilibrium. This concept was introduced by John Nash and refers to a situation where no player can increase their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy if all other players keep their strategies unchanged.

For instance, consider a scenario where two companies are competing for market share. Each company can choose to set a high or low price for their product.

If both companies set a high price, they will split the market share equally (the third-best outcome). If both companies set a low price, they will also split the market share equally but with lower profits (the second-best outcome). However, if one company sets a high price while the other sets a low price, the company with the low price will capture most of the market share and higher profits (the best outcome).

In this scenario, the Nash equilibrium occurs when both companies set a low price. If one company decides to raise its prices unilaterally, it will lose its market share to its competitor. Similarly, if one company decides to lower its prices unilaterally, it will not gain any additional market share because its competitor will also lower their prices.

In conclusion, game theory provides valuable insights into strategic decision-making among multiple players. It offers various strategies that players can use to maximize their payoff or minimize their loss. The examples of Prisoner’s Dilemma and Nash equilibrium demonstrate how individual incentives can lead to suboptimal outcomes for all parties involved and highlight the importance of cooperation and coordination in achieving optimal solutions.