Existentialism and absurdity are two philosophical concepts that have been the subject of debates and discussions for decades. While both of these concepts deal with the meaning of life, they have different approaches to understanding it. In this article, we will explore the differences between existentialism and absurdity.

Existentialism

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that emphasizes individual freedom and choice. It focuses on the existence of an individual as a unique being with their own experiences, thoughts, and feelings. According to existentialists, individuals are responsible for giving meaning to their own lives through their choices and actions.

One of the key ideas in existentialism is the concept of authenticity. This means that individuals must be true to themselves and their own values in order to live a meaningful life. Existentialists argue that individuals should not conform to societal norms or expectations but should instead create their own path in life.

Key Features of Existentialism

Absurdity

Absurdity is a concept that arose out of existentialist thought. It refers to the idea that life is inherently meaningless, irrational, and chaotic. According to absurdist philosophy, individuals exist in an absurd world where there is no inherent purpose or meaning.

Absurdism emphasizes the human struggle to find meaning in a meaningless world. It highlights the absurdity of human existence and the futility of trying to find a rational explanation for it. Absurdists argue that individuals should accept the irrationality of life and embrace the absurdity of existence.

Key Features of Absurdism

Differences Between Existentialism and Absurdity

While existentialism and absurdity share some similarities, there are also significant differences between these two philosophical concepts. The main difference between existentialism and absurdity is their approach to the meaning of life.

Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom and choice in creating meaning in life. It believes that individuals are responsible for giving meaning to their own lives through their choices and actions.

On the other hand, absurdism argues that life is inherently meaningless, irrational, and chaotic. It emphasizes accepting the irrationality of life and embracing its absurdity.

Another key difference between existentialism and absurdity is their view on societal norms. Absurdists do not reject societal norms but emphasize the futility of trying to find a rational explanation for them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, existentialism and absurdity are two philosophical concepts that deal with the meaning of life. While both of these concepts have similarities, they have different approaches to understanding life’s purpose.

Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom and choice in creating meaning in life, while absurdity argues that life is inherently meaningless, irrational, and chaotic. Regardless of which philosophy one subscribes to, both offer unique perspectives on human existence and the search for meaning.