# What Is Game Theory Explain With Example?

//

Diego Sanchez

Game theory is a fascinating concept that has been applied to various fields, including economics, psychology, political science, and biology. It is a mathematical framework that helps us understand how people make decisions in strategic situations where the outcome of one’s choice depends on the choices of others. In this article, we will explore what game theory is and provide an example to illustrate its application.

## What Is Game Theory?

Game theory is a tool used to analyze decision-making in situations where multiple individuals or organizations interact with each other. It provides a framework for understanding how players will act in response to the actions taken by others. The central idea of game theory is that the outcome of any decision depends not only on what one chooses but also on what others choose.

The goal of game theory is to predict the behavior of players in these strategic situations and identify the best course of action for each player. Game theorists use various mathematical models to analyze different scenarios and determine optimal strategies.

## An Example

To better understand game theory, let’s consider an example called “The Prisoner’s Dilemma.” In this scenario, two criminals are arrested and charged with a crime. The prosecutor has strong evidence against them but lacks sufficient evidence for a conviction.

The prosecutor offers each criminal a deal: if one confesses and implicates their partner while the other remains silent, then the confessor will be given a reduced sentence while their partner will receive a harsher punishment. If both remain silent, then both will receive moderate sentences. If both confess, then both will receive harsh sentences.

The Payoff Matrix

To analyze this scenario using game theory, we first create a payoff matrix that shows the possible outcomes for each player based on their choices. The matrix looks like this:

• If both remain silent: Both get 2 years
• If one confesses and the other remains silent: Confessor gets 1 year, partner gets 5 years
• If both confess: Both get 3 years

Player A’s Strategy

Player A must decide whether to remain silent or confess. If player B remains silent, then player A’s best option is to confess and receive a reduced sentence.

If player B confesses, then player A’s best option is still to confess because they will receive a lesser punishment than if both players confess. Therefore, player A’s dominant strategy is to confess.

Player B’s Strategy

Player B faces the same decision between remaining silent or confessing. If player A remains silent, then player B’s best option is to confess and implicate their partner.

If player A confesses, then player B’s best option is still to implicate their partner because they will receive a lesser punishment than if both players confess. Therefore, player B’s dominant strategy is also to confess.

The Outcome

In this scenario, both players have chosen their dominant strategies of confession. As a result, both receive harsher sentences than if they had remained silent. This outcome illustrates the prisoner’s dilemma where each individual pursues their own self-interest despite the fact that cooperation would result in a better outcome for both.

## Conclusion

Game theory provides a framework for understanding decision-making in strategic situations where multiple players interact with each other. By creating models and analyzing possible outcomes, game theorists can predict behavior and identify optimal strategies for each individual. The prisoner’s dilemma example shows us how game theory can be applied to real-life situations and highlights the importance of considering other players’ decisions when making choices.