Can We Know in Epistemology?


Diego Sanchez

In epistemology, the study of knowledge, one of the fundamental questions is whether or not we can truly know anything at all. This question has been debated by philosophers for centuries, and there are a variety of different perspectives on the issue.


One approach to this question is skepticism, which argues that knowledge is impossible. Skeptics argue that we can never be completely certain of anything, and therefore we can never truly know anything. This view is often seen as extreme and impractical, as it would make it impossible to function in our daily lives.


Empiricists take a different approach, arguing that knowledge comes from sensory experience. According to this view, we gain knowledge by observing the world around us and using our senses to gather information. While empiricism has its strengths in explaining how we come to know some things (such as scientific observations), it struggles to explain how we gain knowledge about abstract concepts like justice or morality.


Rationalists take yet another approach, arguing that some knowledge can be gained through reason alone. According to this view, there are certain truths that are self-evident and do not require sensory experience for justification. For example, many rationalists argue that the concept of mathematics exists independently of human experience and can be known through logical reasoning.


Finally, pragmatism takes a more practical approach to the question of knowledge. According to this view, what counts as knowledge depends on its usefulness in solving problems and achieving goals. Pragmatists argue that if a belief works well enough in practice – if it helps us achieve our goals – then we should consider it true for practical purposes.


So can we truly know anything? The answer depends on who you ask.

Skeptics would argue that knowledge is impossible, while empiricists, rationalists, and pragmatists each offer their own approaches to how we can acquire knowledge. Ultimately, the question of what counts as knowledge may never be fully resolved, but by understanding these different perspectives, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexity of this fundamental philosophical issue.

  • Skepticism: argues that knowledge is impossible
  • Empiricism: argues that knowledge comes from sensory experience
  • Rationalism: argues that some knowledge can be gained through reason alone
  • Pragmatism: considers what counts as knowledge depends on its usefulness in solving problems and achieving goals