Introduction

Existentialism and absurdism are two philosophical movements that emerged in the 20th century. Both schools of thought deal with the meaning of human existence and the search for purpose in life.

However, there are significant differences between them that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the key differences between absurdism and existentialism.

What is Existentialism

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that emphasizes individual freedom and choice. It argues that individuals are responsible for creating their own meaning in life, as opposed to relying on external factors such as religion or societal norms. Existentialists believe that life has no inherent meaning, and it is up to each individual to create their own sense of purpose.

The key themes of existentialism include:

What is Absurdism

Absurdism is a philosophical movement that argues human existence is inherently meaningless, irrational, and chaotic. It suggests that individuals should embrace this lack of meaning rather than trying to find purpose or order in life. Absurdists argue that attempts to find meaning are futile because there is no objective truth or morality.

The key themes of absurdism include:

The Differences Between Absurdism and Existentialism

While both absurdism and existentialism deal with questions of meaning and purpose, they approach these questions in very different ways. Here are some key differences between the two:

1. Attitude Towards Life

The main difference between absurdism and existentialism is their attitude towards life. Existentialists believe that individuals have the power to create their own meaning in life, whereas absurdists suggest that life is inherently meaningless.

2. Emphasis on Individual Freedom

Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom and choice, while absurdism takes this emphasis even further by suggesting that individuals should rebel against societal norms and values in favor of complete personal freedom.

3. Use of Humor

Absurdists often use humor as a way to confront the irrationality of life, while existentialists tend to take a more serious approach to questions of meaning and purpose.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while both absurdism and existentialism deal with similar questions about the nature of human existence, they approach these questions in very different ways. Existentialists believe that individuals have the power to create their own meaning in life, while absurdist suggest that life is inherently meaningless. Both movements offer unique perspectives on the human experience and can provide valuable insights into the search for purpose and meaning in life.