RSS

Category Archives: Organ Donations Are Not Tax Deductible

The Cremated Are Positively Green with Envy

Thinking about being cremated? Well hold off until you’ve finished reading this. And don’t worry: no judgments here. You can shove yourself into a trash compactor for all I care. It certainly has become a much more popular way of disposing of the dead. (Cremation, not trash disposal, although you never know what’s next in Oregon.)

For example, 99.85% of Japanese are cremated, and that’s just Toyota employees. Fewer than 10% of Italians and Poles are cremated, however, no doubt owing to the Catholic discouragement of having anything to do with fire after death.

In the United States, cremation rates vary wildly by state. Nevadans can’t cremate themselves fast enough, at 68.41%, and no one seems to be complaining, while Mississippians prefer the old-fashioned way, at a scant 9.56%.

The traditional theological arguments against cremation are waning. Originally cremation was absolutely forbidden by church authorities, as sloppy procedures would often result in entire cities being set aflame, with dispossessed bishops having to endure sleepovers with cobblers. (It was also believed that making God go to the trouble of reconstituting your ashes at the resurrection would result in a diminution of eternal rewards, roughly the equivalent of two weeks’ pay and nosebleed seats at all the best praise-band recitals.)

In the Middle Ages, only heretics and the pestilent were cremated, a ceremony often accompanied by games, jousts, and the medieval equivalent of karaoke, with young maidens having to endure malodorous chevaliers mewling their way through Journey’s “Open Arms.”

But as notions of “sanctity” gave way to practical concerns about space and expense, melting one’s recently deceased into urn-size crumbles became more acceptable, accompanied by its own ceremonies and featuring decorous vases that occasionally proved downright prize worthy.

But that was then, and this is now. This is now, yes? If it’s still then, this entire blog post will be for nought. So let’s go with the premise that this is now.

Global warming: the earth’s way of saying get off. Obdurate race that we are, we nevertheless remain fixed, at least for the extent of our three score ten. But cremation is an energy-wasteful and somewhat toxic procedure, and so it was only a matter of time before some Earth Firsting fanatic dreamt up a greener way of removing one’s examinate relations from view.

What would you say to liquefaction? Well, who asked you? A Glasgow-based company, Resomation Ltd., has strode fearlessly into that Brave New World of precious bodily fluids:

The makers claim the process produces a third less greenhouse gas than cremation, uses a seventh of the energy, and allows for the complete separation of dental amalgam for safe disposal.

Mercury from amalgam vaporised in crematoria is blamed for up to 16% of UK airborne mercury emissions, and many UK crematoria are currently fitting mercury filtration systems to meet reduced emission targets.

“Resomation was developed in response to the public’s increasing environmental concerns,” company founder Sandy Sullivan told BBC News. “It gives them that working third choice, which allows them to express those concerns in a very positive and I think personal way.”

Before you sniff disdainfully, consider the possibilities. While “body tissue is dissolved and the liquid poured into the municipal water system,” I don’t see why relatives can’t keep demand possession, and perhaps add a little to the morning coffee, as a sign of solidarity and communion with the extended family member. Gives a whole new meaning to “Granny’s elixir,” now with 25% more Granny.

If this is too hippie-dippy for your taste, there’s always freeze-drying:

Another “green” alternative to cremation is in the pipeline. Susanne Wiigh-Masak, a Swedish biologist, has for a decade proposed a technology she calls Promession.

The process involves a fully automated and patented machine. Coffins are fed in one end, and the body removed from the coffin within the unit and then treated with liquid nitrogen.

The body is then vibrated until the body fragments, after which the remains are dried and refined further, and then passed through filters to remove metals, including dental amalgam. The remains are then poured into a square biodegradable coffin, again automatically, for shallow burial.

And lest we forget, there’s still the most practical means of recycling our deceased:

 

For Sale: One Uvula, Slightly Used

A little behind on your rent or mortgage? Need some cash fast for your kid’s college career? Is your car up on blocks? Does your toupee need some serious dry cleaning? Consider selling your body. No, not like that. LIterally. Sell your body. In parts.

For the most part, it’s illegal to sell your body in Britain. But, in fact, there are various legal ways human body parts can be sold that don’t involve waking up in a bath of ice with a kidney missing. In a research experiment, I tried to see how much of the human body can lawfully be put up for sale: by trying to sell as much of my own body as I could. It turns out pretty much everything God gave us can be sold.

Why would I do this? Body parts are sold on the black market because there’s often a genuine medical need. This year, 1,000 people in the UK will die on the organ transplant list. Couples unable to conceive wait years for donations of egg or sperm. Some doctors argue that a legal market for life-giving body parts should to be created in order to increase donations. But there are enormous ethical concerns and so far the government has refused to allow any kind of financial incentive for donors, apart from allowing some expenses. I investigated whether the law is hindering a legitimate market, firstly looking at what’s already on sale here in Britain – and whether the price is reasonable.

Turns out there’s a market for bodily fluids, hair, nails, even excreta. Of course, if you want some real coin, you have to think kidney, lung, eggs, a thorax—you know, the big stuff.

How long before advocates of laissez faire everything make a push to legalize the selling of body parts? Hey, it’s your body. You should be able to do what you want with it, no? Remember “Keep your rosaries off my ovaries”? Pancreas pushers will need a new slogan to include guys, as well as unisex organs.

“Keep your BLANK off my prostate/gall bladder/adrenals!”

Any suggestions?

 

UK Stem-Cell Scientist Proposes Harvesting Organs from Aborted Fetuses, Uncertain Whether Such Donations Will Be Tax Deductible

beyo1216xThis is one of the “solutions” proposed by one of the best and the brightest, Sir Richard Gardner, to solve a kidney-shortage problem.

Calling for studies into the feasibility of transplanting foetal organs, Sir Richard, an advisor to Britain’s fertility watchdog and the Royal Society, said he was surprised the possibility had not been considered, and that experiments in mice have shown that foetal kidneys grow extremely quickly when transplanted to adult animals.

Sir Richard said: ‘It is probably a more realistic technique in dealing with the shortage of kidney donors than others.’

However, he added that much research would be needed to show such transplants were effective.

Not everyone in the medical establishment saw “effectiveness” as the only impediment:

Dr Peter Saunders, of the Christian Medical Fellowship, said the transplants would be immoral as every human being, even the unborn, deserved ‘protection, respect, wonder and empathy’.

Josephine Quintavalle, of Comment on Reproductive Ethics, described the proposal as ‘absolutely horrifying’. She said: ‘At what stage do you say to the woman who is to have an abortion, “Can we have some organs for transplant?” ‘

At the stage where the utilitarian value of human beings is all the value that matters.

But Professor Stuart Campbell, who has argued for the abortion time limit to be lowered, had no ethical objections to the proposal.

He said many babies were aborted quite late, ‘and if they are going to be terminated, it is a shame to waste their organs’.

Waste not, want not, being the operative ethical principle here.

In the November 1984 issue of Commentary magazine, there was an article by Mary Tedeschi called “Infanticide and Its Apologists.” In it, she cites a pediatric surgeon by the name of Anthony Shaw who devised a mathematical formula by which to determine whether a given handicapped infant should live or die. It went like this:

QL = NE x (H + S)

In other words, the Quality of Life equals Natural Endowment multiplied by potential contribution to the Home plus potential contribution to Society.

Now, I know the issue at hand is not infanticide or the handicapped, but how long before the undesirable become fodder for the more desirable due to cold, hard calculations similar to the one above?

 

Assisted-Suicide Ring Busted by FBI, Thought ‘First Do No Harm’ Was Code for ‘This Will Only Hurt a Minute’

Kevorkian.jpgThe mysterious death of one 58-year-old man suffering from throat and mouth cancer may lead to the exposure of a “Final Exit” Network of assisted-suiciders responsible for several more deaths.

Those seeking to end their lives are assigned to an ‘exit guide’ who instructs them to purchase two new helium tanks and a hood, known as an ‘exit bag’.

When ready to commit suicide, [FBI spokesman John] Bankhead said, the member is visited by the ‘exit guide’ and a ‘senior exit guide’ to lead them through the process.

The group’s vice president said it supports those with irreversible illnesses who choose to end their lives, but its volunteers don’t actively participate in the life-ending procedures.

The group started in 2004 and has 3,000 dues-paying members.

And if you refuse to pay your dues, what? They let you live?

 

PETA Prez Asks to Be BBQ’d, Hacked to Pieces When She’s Dead, Fur Industry Asks ‘Must We Wait?’

500-circus_animalsIt’s not really clear whether this is a Swiftian “Modest Proposal,” attempted merely to highlight the horrors that are the bacon double-cheeseburger and the dancing bear, or whether Ms. Newkirk is a dangerous fanatic who should be watched by Homeland Security and possibly Bellevue’s Ward 6.

Please note that the two are not mutually exclusive.

 

Swiss Bank to Reveal Names of Tax Cheats, Recipe for Orange Julius, Who Is Buried in Grant’s Tomb

data1Now you know things are bad when you can’t even hide your loot in a Swiss bank anymore.

“The veil of secrecy has been pulled aside and we will continue to aggressively pursue those who shirk their federal tax obligations or assist others in doing so,” said John DiCicco, acting assistant attorney-general of the justice department’s tax division.

Unemployment isn’t high enough without putting CPAs out of work too? Hel-l-l-o-o-o.

 

If You Sell Your Virginity to the Highest Bidder, Does That Still Make You a Slut?

This is all so 1970s ...So she’s selling her virginity under the auspices of that venerable philanthropic organization the Moonlight Bunny Club of Nevada.

“I feel people should be pro-choice with their body,” said “Natalie Dylan.”

Is this what the modern feminist/pro-choice movement had devolved into? Or is this just nostalgia for the 1970s?

Or is she just one of a new generation of entrepreneurs?

“It really comes down to a moral and religious argument, and this doesn’t go against my religion or my morals. There’s no right or wrong to this.”

So exactly what religion does she adhere to? Don’t say it. Don’t say it — we don’t know she’s an Episcopalian. There, you said. And I asked you not to. You had to go there. That’s it — get off my blog. Get off. GET OFF! No, seriously, get off, you’re hurting my neck …

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 242 other followers

%d bloggers like this: