RSS

Category Archives: I Know You Think I Don't Know What You're Really Saying

I Hate Religion Too

So this kid, Jefferson Bethke, aged 22, now has his 15 minutes of fame. I think less for his video in which he raps his contempt for religion but love of Christ, and more for the negative criticism it has engendered. LCMS Pastor Jonathan Fisk rapped his own response, and the blogs have weighed in, Catholic and Protestant, with an irenic back-and-forth between Bethke and Kevin DeYoung rounding out the rodeo.

So here’s my take on this whole I hate religion/love Jesus thing: the kid’s basically right, and everyone should stop getting their Roman collars and Geneva bands in a twist about it.

It shouldn’t come as any great surprise that a young evangelical hates religion but loves Jesus. Anyone who has spent any time in the evangelical world, which I did for many years, knows the familiar trope: Religion kills. Not in the Inquisition/Crusades/Thirty Years War kinda way (although that too). It kills the spirit. It’s the stuff of rite and ritual, litany and lethargy, pious sighs and disappointment.

Evangelical churches are filled with people who got fed up with religion, especially the religion of their youth. They wanted something more. They wanted a personal relationship with God. They wanted union with God. They wanted something that meant more that going through the diocesan or synodically approved motions. They no longer wanted the church, which had become falsely equated with religion, as their mediator — they wanted Christ. And Christ is a person, not a religion. Read the rest of this entry »

 

Obama Sold Bombs to Israel in Secret. I Don’t Get It Either.

So this president was shaping up to be a friend of Israel the likes of which have not been seen since Amalek. Had the Jewish state taken its grievances to Vespasian’s kid Titus it would have been better. As far as U.S.-Israeli relations were concerned, Obama should have been buried upside down in the ground like an onion, if truth be told.

But now we learn that:

While publicly pressuring Israel to make deeper concessions to the Palestinians, President Obama has secretly authorized significant new aid to the Israeli military that includes the sale of 55 deep-penetrating bombs known as bunker busters, Newsweek has learned.

In an exclusive story to be published Monday on growing military cooperation between the two allies, U.S. and Israeli officials tell Newsweek that the GBU-28 Hard Target Penetrators—potentially useful in any future military strike against Iranian nuclear sites—were delivered to Israel in 2009, just several months after Obama took office.

The military sale was arranged behind the scenes as Obama’s demands for Israel to stop building settlements in disputed territories were fraying political relations between the two countries in public.

Ah, the catch. Or is something else going on that only discerning political minds can fathom, like from 10,000 miles away?

James Cartwright, the Marine Corps general who served until August as the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Newsweek the military chiefs had no objections to the sale. Rather, Cartwright said, there was a concern about “how the Iranians would perceive it,” and “how the Israelis might perceive it.” In other words, would the sale be seen as a green light for Israel to attack Iran’s secret nuclear sites one day?

Yeah. We can’t have that. Because a world without Iranian nukes is like a day without sunshine. Actually, a day with Iranian nukes is like a day without sunshine, because the mushroom clouds would most probably blot out the sun, which is what killed off the dinosaurs, no? Or is that theory going the way of nothing-can-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light? (I could have told you that was baloney: ever see a McDonald’s Happy Meal make its way through a hungry 10-year-old?)

But, as usual, I digress. How this bunker-busting bombapalooza plays out, especially in light of the Abbas-threatened Palestinian-statehood vote in the UN, should be interesting, and by interesting I mean ridiculous, as this has all the makings of either grand guignol or commedia dell’ arte, depending on how much air time the anti-Israel nuts are given and how utterly silly the U.S. is beginning to look as its influence in the region fades like the once-seraphic looks of Miss California 1952.

 

Southern Baptists Considering Name Change, and Don’t Call Them Shirley

Southern Baptists are pondering whether to change their name. Which leads me to believe that they’re running from a reputation. What reputation would that be, exactly?

[SBC President Bryant] Wright explained that the denomination’s name poses some barriers, especially in church planting efforts, noting that it’s “so regional,” as reported by Baptist Press.

“[A] name change could position us to maximize our effectiveness in reaching North America for Jesus Christ in the 21st century,” he stated.

Uh huh. Right. Al Mohler, on the other hand, comes closer to the truth:

We were established as an association of churches that would appoint slaveholders as missionaries. There is so much to celebrate in the heritage of our beloved denomination, but there is also a deep stain that is associated with slavery, the nation’s sectional division prior to and during the Civil War, and the legacy of racism,” he wrote.

“If these issues can be resolved, even to any significant degree, by a name change, a Gospel-minded people would never hesitate to consider such a proposal.”

But that’s the point: How realistic is it to expect those issues to be resolved by simply changing their name — and to what exactly? (Should you have a suggestion, click here. I already submitted “Primitive General Sometimes-Free-Sometimes-Bound-Will Six-Day Creation Baptists but Not Anabaptists of North America and Parts of Belize Inc.,” so I call dibs.)

There must be something in the water, because Campus Crusade for Christ just decided it needed a makeover, too, and changed its name to Cru.

One more thing: What’s going to happen if the whole Arminian-Calvinist debate within the convention never gets resolved? Can the two habitually antagonistic conceptions of God’s sovereignty coexist within the same moniker? What if there’s finally a divorce between the parties? Who gets custody of the new name?

Oh things were so much easier when the Jesus people were simply called The Way (which, of course, is now the name of a cult). We could all try reclaiming it, but Christians being a fractious people, there would inevitably be a schism between the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

 

Sacramone’s Fine Distinctions for the 21st Century

Republican: Someone who thinks Social Security should be ended the day after he dies.

Democrat: Someone who can’t decide which is the greater threat to human flourishing: the U.S. military or trans-fats.

Conservative: Someone who thinks the only president worse than Barack Obama was Dwight Eisenhower.

Neo-Conservative: Someone who thinks a country no one cares about wants democracy so badly it is willing to have the U.S. military incite a 20-year civil war to achieve it.

Paleo-Conservative: Someone who thinks that … damn Jews

Libertarian: An anarchist with a mortgage.

Anarchist: A libertarian who can’t qualify for a mortgage.

American: Someone who can no longer afford his mortgage. Read the rest of this entry »

 

Mrs. JFK Expressed Unkindnesses Toward MLK and LBJ

So a book is coming out that conveys the contents of a series of interviews historian Arthur Schlesinger, one of JFK’s best and brightest, conducted with Jacqueline Kennedy in 1964, before the presidential election of that year.

The original tapes of these interviews were thought burned, I believe. It is certain that the persons involved did not want them transcribed in their lifetimes.

It seems the first lady didn’t think Lyndon Johnson would make much of a president. A lot of people would consider that prescient. As for her opinion of Martin Luther King Jr.:

She called him “tricky” and a “phony” after hearing about FBI tapes of him and a woman in his hotel room, while noting that JFK had urged her not to be judgmental. (JFK’s own adulterous affairs weren’t yet widely known.)

She said King had mocked her husband’s funeral and Cardinal Richard Cushing, who celebrated Mass at the funeral.

“He made fun of Cardinal Cushing and said that he was drunk at it,” she said. “And things about they almost dropped the coffin. I just can’t see a picture of Martin Luther King without thinking, you know, that man’s terrible.”

Context is everything. The tone of some of the discussions, however, is what you’d expect between friends who didn’t think they were speaking for posterity.  Read the rest of this entry »

 

Mel Gibson May Direct Film About Judah Maccabee, Because the Only Good Hebrew Is a Dead…

Oh, I just couldn’t resist. (You know how I get…) Now I have no interest in kicking a Mel when he’s down, especially because when this Mel gets mad, we’re in Hannibal Lecter territory. He’s a gifted guy, and a funny guy, who’s also a tormented guy, with a proclivity to torment others, it seems.

But this item about Gibson’s directing or producing  an epic tale of how the Maccabees threw off Seleucid rule in Judea in order to restore right worship of the one true God can be read one of two ways:

1. Gibson wants to show people that he is not anti-Semitic by casting ancient Hebrews as heroic and faithful and true.

2. Gibson wants to use the Maccabees as a stand-in for his own Braveheartish traditionalist battle against the pagans in the MSM (and the cowardly liberals within the Church).

If he really wanted to accomplish #1, he could have made a film about the Warsaw Ghetto uprising or, better yet, how about adapting David I. Kertzer’s The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara, and in such a manner that Pius IX is not depicted as the hero of that story?

That Joe Eszterhas is writing the script for the Maccabees story is sorta interesting, and by interesting I mean terrifying. He is the famous/infamous screenwriter of Showgirls and Flashdance and Basic Instinct. He is also a recent revert to Catholicism, a process he wrote about in The Crossbearer.

We shall see what we shall see. It could be great. Or the Seleucids could come off as just misunderstood. Good dancers, but with daddy issues.

 

Wilson vs. Hitchens vs. Evil

Douglas Wilson is the pastor of Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho, and a prolific writer—of books, blog posts, and articles for Credenda Agenda. He is also the star of a film called Collision, which chronicles his multi-city debate tour with Christopher Hitchens. (Oh, he is also inadvertently responsible for Luther at the Movies. More about that later.)

The Gospel Coalition asked Wilson to comment on Hitchens’s most recent 9/11 article, the one I blogged about a couple of days ago. He had this to say:

Christopher Hitchens is at his very best when he is making sense. This is something he does, with his usual vim, in a recent article for Slate entitled “Simply Evil.” In it, he makes short work of the kind of anti-Americanism that tried to turn 9/11 into something complex enough for an obfuscating intellectual to puzzle over. He nails those who tried to blame the attacks on “the Bush administration or the Jews.” And for those who held up a simplistic tit-for-tat blowback explanation, Hitchens dutifully pulls their shirts over their heads and rolls down their socks.

And at the same time, Hitchens defends himself ably against charges that he must have turned into a rah-rah Americano by pointing out that he was a named plaintiff in a lawsuit brought by the ACLU against the National Security Agency concerning warrantless wiretaps. He also arranged to have himself waterboarded in order to argue persuasively to his readers that such practices did indeed constitute torture. He wrote critically and honestly on the subjects of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, and he has formally registered his contempt for the security theater fraud perpetrated, at an airport near you, by uniformed members of the TSA. Read the rest of this entry »

 

Snooze to This News: Top 5 Conservative Colleges Are Also the Top 5 Right-Wing Colleges

I often check into the new aggregator Newser to get a quick take on a wide variety of stories, both mainstream and wacky. The Newser editors craft able abstracts of the stories with links to the original sources.

So I’m sitting in my not-so-local Starbucks sipping on my molto-venti Apocalytpo Mocha-Chocolato Grosso Hihowareya and I come across this Newser item (underscore added):

ThinkProgress factors in notable alumni and political influence to come up with the top 5 conservative colleges in the nation:

1. Liberty University…

OK. So I click on the ThinkProgress link and I see this (underscore added):

With the start of a new school year, online publications are rushing to print superficial lists ranking America’s colleges and universities. ThinkProgress has compiled a far more useful list of the top five most right-wing places of higher learning:

Now what’s curiouser is that the ThinkProgress post has as its headline “America’s Top 5 Most Conservative Colleges.”

Notice the declension: Conservative…Most Conservative…Right Wing… Read the rest of this entry »

 

The NY Times/Bill Keller Irreligious Litmus Test

Since I am rarely prepared to give a journalist the benefit of the doubt when it comes to his or her objectivity or fairness, I have prepared three possible answers to Mr. Keller’s questions. Also, I am assuming these questions are directed at Christians only, for reasons too obvious to explain:

1. Is it fair to question presidential candidates about details of their faith?

a. Yes, assuming it is a fair-minded attempt to accumulate either biographical information—better insight into what has informed a candidate’s worldview—or to determine whether answers to questions that faith provides are also answers to questions most people assume science or history or common sense provides.

b. No, because that is private, and you’re only trying to ridicule me and thereby discourage other Christians from running for public office, which is their right.

c. Don’t worry, Bill: I’m an atheist just like Than Shwe.

2. Is it fair to question candidates about controversial remarks made by their pastors, mentors, close associates or thinkers whose books they recommend?

a. Yes, assuming it is, again, to get a better idea of what has influenced candidates’ thinking and whether they can think for themselves. If the questioner believes every Christian takes as Holy Writ every word that drops from a minister’s or priest’s lips, or for that matter, that drops out of text written by Martin Luther, John Calvin—or, God help us, John Hagee—then he is an idiot and should probably not be asking these questions of anyone.

b. No, because what goes on within the walls of a church is fit only for members/believers, and can only be misconstrued by outsiders.

c. Don’t worry, Bill: I’m an atheist just Benito Mussolini. Read the rest of this entry »

 

Bug-Eyed Bachmann on Newsweek

When the National Organization for Womens is calling you names for being mean to a right-winger like Michele Bachmann, you know you’ve crossed a line.

Have you seen the latest cover of Newsweek, per chance? Of course not. No one has. No one has read that rag since Mark McGwire was going for number 62. But if you happen to be bored at a checkout stand, and you can tear yourself away from the pictures of a half-naked Kim Kardashian on the cover of the National Perspirer, take a look at Michele Bachmann’s kisser. I’d rather have Charles Manson’s driver’s license photo splattered on a magazine cover than that imitation of The Amazing Criswell.

And why is she a queen? Why can’t she be a king? Or a knight? Or a pawn?

Sexist? I think so.

Tina Brown, editor of the new new new Newsweek, as well as the same old Daily Beast, begs to differ.

Well, beg all you want: You know what you did. And why. Not that I have a horse in this race. Not that I’m calling anyone a horse either. That would be wrong. Just that I wouldn’t vote for Michele Bachmann if she were the only person running against, well, The Amazing Criswell. At least he was amazing.

P.S. I was joking about the Manson thing, and then I stumbled onto this.

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 115 other followers